Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755977Ab0AMP7Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:59:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755885Ab0AMP7O (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:59:14 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29947 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755969Ab0AMP7N (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:59:13 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:59:06 -0500 From: Dave Jones To: Thomas Renninger Cc: Wu Fengguang , LKML Subject: Re: [BUGFIX] cpufreq: dont BUG_ON uninitialized policy cpu Message-ID: <20100113155905.GA1965@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Thomas Renninger , Wu Fengguang , LKML References: <20100113051438.GA32519@localhost> <4B4DBFBC.4090400@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B4DBFBC.4090400@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 872 Lines: 20 On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 01:42:36PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On 01/13/2010 06:14 AM, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > Remove a BUG_ON which is always triggered here after commit 0b19a310eebb93: > The patch got dropped from -mm. > I hope it did not make it upstream yet, otherwise it should also > get dropped/reverted there without replacement. > There wasn't a real, only a theoretical issue. > Looking at it again, I now think it's not needed at all. dropped from cpufreq.git I'm still curious how we're calling cpufreq_update_policy with no policy set. I suspect cpufreq_stats might be doing something wrong. Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/