Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 19:56:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 19:56:06 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:16910 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 19:55:59 -0500 Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.18pre25 To: andrea@suse.de (Andrea Arcangeli) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 00:27:58 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20001208012052.A23992@inspiron.random> from "Andrea Arcangeli" at Dec 08, 2000 01:20:52 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Such bug can't generate crashes. Did you ever reproduced crashes on your 8Mb > 486 with 2.2.18pre24? Yes. Every 20 minutes or so quite reliably. With that change it has yet to crash (its actually running that + page aging + another minor tweak so it doesnt return success on page aging until we have a clump of free pages. With just the page aging patch it performed way better but still hung. > ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.2/2.2.18pre24aa1/00_account-failed-buffer-tries-1 > Oh well ;) > account-failed-buffer-tries-1 is included in VM-global-7 and it was > described in the 2.2.18pre21aa2 email to l-k (CC'ed you) in date Fri, 17 Nov > 2000 18:54:43 +0100: The problem is its hard to know which of your patches depend on what, and the complete set is large to say the least. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/