Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755221Ab0ANBkl (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:40:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754829Ab0ANBkk (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:40:40 -0500 Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:1155 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750717Ab0ANBkj (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:40:39 -0500 Subject: netdev: patchwork.ozlabs.org vs patchwork.kernel.org ? From: Joe Perches To: David Miller Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev In-Reply-To: <20100113.173253.223656114.davem@davemloft.net> References: <3DBBD805E3BA064A87F551C0E8BD36740289748A@MAILSRV.intcomgrp.com> <20100113.173253.223656114.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:40:37 -0800 Message-ID: <1263433237.1966.37.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 619 Lines: 15 On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 17:32 -0800, David Miller wrote: > Encoding your patches as base64 binary octet stream attachments > causes them to get missed by our automated patch tracking system: > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/ What is the reason why netdev doesn't use patchwork.kernel.org? It seems odd that it doesn't. Odd like the arm mailing lists. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/