Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757634Ab0ANU0y (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:26:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757610Ab0ANU0x (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:26:53 -0500 Received: from server109i.appriver.com ([72.32.253.93]:3541 "EHLO server109.appriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756737Ab0ANU0w convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:26:52 -0500 X-Policy: GLOBAL - intcomgrp.com X-Policy: GLOBAL - intcomgrp.com X-Primary: jkosin@intcomgrp.com X-Note: This Email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide X-ALLOW: JKosin@intcomgrp.com ALLOWED X-Virus-Scan: V- X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: X-Country-Path: UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES X-Note-Sending-IP: 216.54.13.100 X-Note-Reverse-DNS: mail.intcomgrp.com X-Note-WHTLIST: JKosin@intcomgrp.com X-Note: User Rule Hits: X-Note: Global Rule Hits: G113 G114 G115 G116 G120 G121 G132 G219 X-Note: Encrypt Rule Hits: X-Note: Mail Class: ALLOWEDSENDER X-Note: Headers Injected X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] net: at91_ether.c - Allow transmitter interrupt to be handled first in ISR Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:28:38 -0500 Message-ID: <3DBBD805E3BA064A87F551C0E8BD367402897539@MAILSRV.intcomgrp.com> In-Reply-To: <20100113.173253.223656114.davem@davemloft.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [PATCH 1/2] net: at91_ether.c - Allow transmitter interrupt to be handled first in ISR Thread-Index: AcqUubmOl/m1delnRjWCeXIaLhRbGgAm71GA References: <3DBBD805E3BA064A87F551C0E8BD36740289748A@MAILSRV.intcomgrp.com> <20100113.173253.223656114.davem@davemloft.net> From: "James Kosin" To: "David Miller" Cc: , , Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 871 Lines: 23 Thanks David, I'm checking out the latest git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.git With git now... A few items: a) Is it OK to use git-diff to build a patch file? Or does everyone still prefer diff? b) I'm going to try and test also; since, I do have an active platform I can test on. Are there any other developers using the ARM that may be able to provide some feedback? Eric Dumazet had some interesting comments but, none of the original people in the file are around anymore I'm afraid. That or they really don't want to be contacted. Thanks Again, James Kosin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/