Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754183Ab0AQQno (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:43:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754073Ab0AQQnm (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:43:42 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f225.google.com ([209.85.220.225]:48321 "EHLO mail-fx0-f225.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753747Ab0AQQnm (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:43:42 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=fd1o1rtj5Xr1LljcicjJ8IQFLNoZpDgPFlpzELQeC/FAiIMRbT2WF5BzJCjJWBOC1V hMAmNTYblUg4uVzfjLXILl0IB5VXVGOQksVz01JTarfGx8dOIbNu2zaUIQgsFSaoY1JY wrmQorT7pwoq2MGYnk68Hj2gP7eTCtCuMftFY= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100117161726.5752b181@schatten.dmk.lab> References: <20100116174821.GA18306@redhat.com> <201001162257.16277.rjw@sisk.pl> <20100117123218.GA3182@redhat.com> <84144f021001170618g708a7c14ob1b222ab1cbdaa20@mail.gmail.com> <20100117161726.5752b181@schatten.dmk.lab> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:43:40 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fe053a0ee2590573 Message-ID: <84144f021001170843s67afae24oaabf09e9b13af8db@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 From: Pekka Enberg To: Florian Mickler Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Jesse Barnes , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 932 Lines: 21 Hi Florian, (Please don't trim the cc list.) On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Florian Mickler wrote: > on which side of the merge? linus or drm? > i.e. it is to be expected to be before the merge, (but on the drm side) > so don't get confused... or did i misunderstood the situation? Like I said, don't read too much into the results but the current situation looks like the regression happened _after_ 2.6.32 but before any of the DRM code was merged to 2.6.33-rc1. I don't think that makes much sense which is why I'm back to testing 2.6.32 more to see if the bug is there already but just harder to trigger for whatever reason. Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/