Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754558Ab0ARAJ1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:09:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754231Ab0ARAJ0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:09:26 -0500 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:49586 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753515Ab0ARAJ0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:09:26 -0500 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:05:49 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki To: Balbir Singh Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Andrew Morton , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" Subject: Re: [RFC] Shared page accounting for memory cgroup Message-Id: <20100118090549.6d3af93b.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <661de9471001171130p2b0ac061he6f3dab9ef46fd06@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100104093528.04846521.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100106070150.GL3059@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20100106161211.5a7b600f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100107071554.GO3059@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20100107163610.aaf831e6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100107083440.GS3059@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20100107174814.ad6820db.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100107180800.7b85ed10.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100107092736.GW3059@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20100108084727.429c40fc.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <661de9471001171130p2b0ac061he6f3dab9ef46fd06@mail.gmail.com> Organization: FUJITSU Co. LTD. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2903 Lines: 78 On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:00:44 +0530 Balbir Singh wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:17 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki > wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:57:36 +0530 > > Balbir Singh wrote: > > > >> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [2010-01-07 18:08:00]: > >> > >> > On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 17:48:14 +0900 > >> > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > >> > > > > "How pages are shared" doesn't show good hints. I don't hear such parameter > >> > > > > is used in production's resource monitoring software. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > You mean "How many pages are shared" are not good hints, please see my > >> > > > justification above. With Virtualization (look at KSM for example), > >> > > > shared pages are going to be increasingly important part of the > >> > > > accounting. > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > Considering KSM, your cuounting style is tooo bad. > >> > > > >> > > You should add > >> > > > >> > >  - MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SHARED_BY_KSM > >> > >  - MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FOR_TMPFS/SYSV_IPC_SHMEM > >> > > > >> > >> No.. I am just talking about shared memory being important and shared > >> accounting being useful, no counters for KSM in particular (in the > >> memcg context). > >> > > Think so ? The number of memcg-private pages is in interest in my point of view. > > > > Anyway, I don't change my opinion as "sum of rss" is not necessary to be calculated > > in the kernel. > > If you want to provide that in memcg, please add it to global VM as /proc/meminfo. > > > > IIUC, KSM/SHMEM has some official method in global VM. > > > > Kamezawa-San, > > I implemented the same in user space and I get really bad results, here is why > > 1. I need to hold and walk the tasks list in cgroups and extract RSS > through /proc (results in worse hold times for the fork() scenario you > menioned) > 2. The data is highly inconsistent due to the higher margin of error > in accumulating data which is changing as we run. By the time we total > and look at the memcg data, the data is stale > > Would you be OK with the patch, if I renamed "shared_usage_in_bytes" > to "non_private_usage_in_bytes"? > > Given that the stat is user initiated, I don't see your concern w.r.t. > overhead. Many subsystems like KSM do pay the overhead cost if the > user really wants the feature or the data. I would be really > interested in other opinions as well (if people do feel strongly > against or for the feature) > Please add that featuter to global VM before memcg. If VM guyes admits its good, I have no objections more. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/