Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 15:27:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 15:27:13 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:8711 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 15:27:07 -0400 Subject: Re: linux as a minicomputer ? To: hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin) Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 19:56:15 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "H. Peter Anvin" at Apr 11, 2002 12:45:46 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > "Benefits all around?" Such a machine would be slower and more > expensive than four single processor boxes, so what's the point? A lot more manageable and for many setups a lot of terminals in one box actually makes a lot of sense > This is fundamentally the problem with these kinds of schemes -- they > get outcompeted on price and availability by the massmarket items. > This is part of the very attraction of Linux -- it's running Unix on > stock, cheap, hardware. The hardware is now massmarket - otherwise I'd agree wholeheartedly. Video cards are cheap, USB2.0 cards have 4 root bridges per card. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/