Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755476Ab0ARIvR (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:51:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755423Ab0ARIvR (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:51:17 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45601 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755419Ab0ARIvQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:51:16 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:50:22 +0200 From: Gleb Natapov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Peter Zijlstra , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, riel@redhat.com, cl@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] Add "handle page fault" PV helper. Message-ID: <20100118085022.GA30698@redhat.com> References: <1262700774-1808-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <1262700774-1808-5-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <1263490267.4244.340.camel@laptop> <20100117144411.GI31692@redhat.com> <4B541D08.9040802@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B541D08.9040802@zytor.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1295 Lines: 29 On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:34:16AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 01/17/2010 06:44 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:31:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >>On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 16:12 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >>>Allow paravirtualized guest to do special handling for some page faults. > >>> > >>>The patch adds one 'if' to do_page_fault() function. The call is patched > >>>out when running on physical HW. I ran kernbech on the kernel with and > >>>without that additional 'if' and result were rawly the same: > >> > >>So why not program a different handler address for the #PF/#GP faults > >>and avoid the if all together? > >I would gladly use fault vector reserved by x86 architecture, but I am > >not sure Intel will be happy about it. > > > > That's what it's there for... see Peter Z.'s response. > Do you mean I can use one of exception vectors reserved by Intel (20-31)? What Peter Z says is that I can register my own handler for #PF and avoid the 'if' in non PV case as far as I understand him. -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/