Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756056Ab0ARTVl (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:21:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756031Ab0ARTVk (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:21:40 -0500 Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.160]:58105 "EHLO e39.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754127Ab0ARTVj (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:21:39 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/7] User Space Breakpoint Assistance Layer (UBP) From: Jim Keniston To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Srikar Dronamraju , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , utrace-devel , Frederic Weisbecker , Maneesh Soni , Mark Wielaard , LKML In-Reply-To: <4B548521.7000704@redhat.com> References: <20100116184833.2s0zihwbggkgccsk@imap.linux.ibm.com> <4B548521.7000704@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:21:22 -0800 Message-Id: <1263842482.5059.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1386 Lines: 31 On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 10:58 -0500, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Jim Keniston wrote: > > Not really. For #3 (boosting), you need to know everything for #2, > > plus be able to compute the length of each instruction -- which we can > > now do for x86. To emulate an instruction (#4), you need to replicate > > what it does, side-effects and all. The x86 instruction set seems to > > be adding new floating-point instructions all the time, and I bet even > > Masami doesn't know what they all do, but so far, they all seem to > > adhere to the instruction-length rules encoded in Masami's instruction > > decoder. > > Actually, current x86 decoder doesn't support FP(x87) instructions.(even > it already supported AVX) But I think it's not so hard to add it. > At one point I verified that it worked for all the x87 instructions in libm: https://www.redhat.com/archives/utrace-devel/2009-March/msg00031.html I'm pretty sure I tested mmx instructions as well. But I guess this was before you rearranged the opcode tables. Yeah, it wouldn't be hard to add back in, at least for purposes of computing instruction lengths. Jim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/