Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 14 Apr 2002 05:50:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 14 Apr 2002 05:50:01 -0400 Received: from mail.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.2]:15108 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 14 Apr 2002 05:50:01 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: Russell King Cc: spyro@armlinux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: usb-uhci *BUG* In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 14 Apr 2002 10:26:32 +0100." <20020414102632.A30379@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 19:49:44 +1000 Message-ID: <1959.1018777784@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 14 Apr 2002 10:26:32 +0100, Russell King wrote: >On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 10:11:48AM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: >> Any particular reason for not using ksymoops? If it does not work on >> arm, I can get rid of all the arm code ;). > >It does work on ARM. I use it, and we've had a few posts using it. >However, since it took several _months_ for the ksymoops version with >the fixed regexps for ARM to come out, I don't really think you're >justified in the above comments. You missed the smiley. I must admit that ksymoops tends to be the poor relation, it is my lowest priority out of ia64, kdb, kbuild, modutils and ksymoops. Now if I could just get kbuild 2.5 and kdb into the kernel, I would have more time for the other projects :-)> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/