Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 14 Apr 2002 06:35:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 14 Apr 2002 06:35:56 -0400 Received: from fungus.teststation.com ([212.32.186.211]:25095 "EHLO fungus.teststation.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 14 Apr 2002 06:35:56 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 12:35:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Urban Widmark X-X-Sender: To: K Shyam cc: Subject: Re: symlink support for sambafs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, K Shyam wrote: > Hello; > Does linux kernel have symlink support for sambfs ? I tried doing a > search on the internet and i obtained a site that gives patches till > version 2.4.0.The address is : > http://131.130.199.155/~aoe/mystuff/smb.symlinks/ > Do the latest versions of the kernel have support for symlinks in smbfs ? No. > I would like to know whether anyone has experiemented with it before i > jump into putting my own effort into porting the code that is already present > to the current kernel. > Finally is symlinks in sambafs a security hazard and hence it is not > implemented ? No, that's not why. This patch uses its own format to store symlinks in. I know cygwin also stores symlinks in a special format, and it would be nice if it could use the same (if possible). It may have been something else I didn't like about the patch too. Now there is also a potential conflict with the work being done on the unix extensions to SMB which allows a samba server to better serve files to a unix client. This includes symlinks. /Urban - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/