Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 14 Apr 2002 09:20:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 14 Apr 2002 09:20:35 -0400 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:59631 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 14 Apr 2002 09:20:35 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 06:22:39 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: bert hubert , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo@conectiva.com.br Subject: Re: -aa VM updates for 2.4 Message-ID: <20020414132239.GX23513@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: bert hubert , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo@conectiva.com.br In-Reply-To: <20020413233906.GB10807@matchmail.com> <3CB8C55F.ECD143F7@zip.com.au> <20020414124046.A2186@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 12:40:46PM +0200, bert hubert wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 11:56:26PM +0000, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > > > > Why haven't any of the -aa VM updates gone into 2.5? Especially after Andrew > > > Morton has split it up this is surprising... > > > > I don't think there's really any point in doing that. > > Are they going to be in 2.4 anytime soon? And if not, why not? > Yes, some have alredy gone into 2.4.19-pre5 or pre6. The large vm patch in -aa was split up by Andrew Morton (as mentioned earlier in this thread). Expect the next batch to go in the next 19-pre or more likely 20-pre because many more people test the released versions than the pre kernels. Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/