Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753353Ab0ASP3I (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:29:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752866Ab0ASP3G (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:29:06 -0500 Received: from mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net ([167.206.4.200]:37424 "EHLO mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752146Ab0ASP3E (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:29:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:28:05 -0500 From: Michael Breuer Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_packet: Don't use skb after dev_queue_xmit() In-reply-to: <20100119084120.GA6366@ff.dom.local> To: Jarek Poplawski Cc: Stephen Hemminger , David Miller , akpm@linux-foundation.org, flyboy@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <4B55CF85.6060600@majjas.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <20100118073018.GA6270@ff.dom.local> <4B548C6B.10607@majjas.com> <20100118204658.GC3157@del.dom.local> <4B54CB0D.5070604@majjas.com> <20100118212516.GE3157@del.dom.local> <4B54D50C.90608@majjas.com> <20100118220814.GG3157@del.dom.local> <20100118221747.GH3157@del.dom.local> <4B54E4EF.8080602@majjas.com> <4B554730.6090000@majjas.com> <20100119084120.GA6366@ff.dom.local> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1264 Lines: 27 On 1/19/2010 3:41 AM, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:46:24AM -0500, Michael Breuer wrote: > >> So net-net, as far as my TX packet loss issue, sky2 is in the clear. If >> something on the linux side should be informing the switch about >> something then there may still be an issue. If the wifi router should be >> doing something differently, then it's unfortunately likely a 2.4.37 >> kernel issue (That's what dd-wrt is using). >> > IMHO until there is no proof from a sniffer or some regs dumps the > switch and the router are more suspicious than your NIC or linux box. > Then debugging these other things isn't so much interesting from my > POV ;-) > > Anyway, if you only want to get it working (instead of debugging), > it seems you might try moving the dhcp server to the router or maybe > even using two separate servers with their pools - unless I missed > something in your config. > > Jarek P. > I'm going to take a stab at debugging before creating a new subnet. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/