Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754796Ab0ATDXk (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:23:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754326Ab0ATDXi (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:23:38 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f225.google.com ([209.85.220.225]:46249 "EHLO mail-fx0-f225.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751059Ab0ATDXh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:23:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4B56685E.9060909@gmail.com> References: <4B56685E.9060909@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:23:36 -0500 Message-ID: <829197381001191923i5d4e74belabaf6a7d9cbf7988@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mxl5005s: bad checks of state->Mode From: Devin Heitmueller To: Roel Kluin Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2356 Lines: 60 On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Roel Kluin wrote: > Regardless of the state->Mode in both cases the same value was > written. > If state->Mode wasn't set, it is always 0. > > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin > --- > ?drivers/media/common/tuners/mxl5005s.c | ? ?7 +++---- > ?1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > Or were the ones and zeroes in these MXL_ControlWrite in the wrong place? > > diff --git a/drivers/media/common/tuners/mxl5005s.c b/drivers/media/common/tuners/mxl5005s.c > index 605e28b..3967412 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/common/tuners/mxl5005s.c > +++ b/drivers/media/common/tuners/mxl5005s.c > @@ -1815,9 +1815,8 @@ static u16 MXL_BlockInit(struct dvb_frontend *fe) > > ? ? ? ?/* Charge Pump Control Dig ?Ana */ > ? ? ? ?status += MXL_ControlWrite(fe, RFSYN_CHP_GAIN, state->Mode ? 5 : 8); > - ? ? ? status += MXL_ControlWrite(fe, > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? RFSYN_EN_CHP_HIGAIN, state->Mode ? 1 : 1); > - ? ? ? status += MXL_ControlWrite(fe, EN_CHP_LIN_B, state->Mode ? 0 : 0); > + ? ? ? status += MXL_ControlWrite(fe, RFSYN_EN_CHP_HIGAIN, 1); > + ? ? ? status += MXL_ControlWrite(fe, EN_CHP_LIN_B, 0); > > ? ? ? ?/* AGC TOP Control */ > ? ? ? ?if (state->AGC_Mode == 0) /* Dual AGC */ { > @@ -2161,7 +2160,7 @@ static u16 MXL_IFSynthInit(struct dvb_frontend *fe) > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?} > ? ? ? ?} > > - ? ? ? if (state->Mode || (state->Mode == 0 && state->IF_Mode == 0)) { > + ? ? ? if (state->Mode || state->IF_Mode == 0) { > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if (state->IF_LO == 57000000UL) { > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?status += MXL_ControlWrite(fe, IF_DIVVAL, ? 0x10); > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?status += MXL_ControlWrite(fe, IF_VCO_BIAS, 0x08); Roel, Thanks for pointing this out. This patch should not be applied. While I agree with Roel's assessment that the logic is incorrect, removing the conditional logic and forcing the register writes to the given value is almost certainly the incorrect fix. I will have to look at the datasheet and see what the logic is actually supposed to be. Devin -- Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs http://www.kernellabs.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/