Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755761Ab0ATGtJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:49:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752682Ab0ATGtH (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:49:07 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:32973 "EHLO mail-pw0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751318Ab0ATGtA (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:49:00 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ZK6+RUy7LyuA/DZsfxhlR9lFrpve3F23qzaiOJECLGAAOa/Wm+WkYWlJSm1IniU71C X1fbHDT9i2nqI4fZu/ScL2YjTGukS143+cP9HG9a9k4jlFe6TjGdgLnZuDoICLkTYO2y JgAwDGNwwqPkidAp2Y4tW7lxdE5emOdZ8FN20= Message-ID: <4B56A8C9.2000807@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:55:05 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091130 SUSE/3.0.0-1.1.1 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bart Hartgers CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, juergen.metzdorf@telelev-dsl.de, markpschool@hotmail.com, sporadic.crash@gmail.com, apopov@sirma.bg, david@coomber.co.za, jay4mail@gmail.com Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] sata_via: Delay on vt6420 when starting ATAPI DMA write References: <20100116235653.898098245@gmail.com> <20100116235851.884756038@gmail.com> <4B5678E2.2050709@gmail.com> <7eb6a4d81001192244k19d28805p9cb4eaec7eed9366@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7eb6a4d81001192244k19d28805p9cb4eaec7eed9366@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 849 Lines: 25 Hello, On 01/20/2010 03:44 PM, Bart Hartgers wrote: > Yes, you're right. I'll drop the printk_once and send another patch > for inclusion. However, for testing I found it very useful to make > sure that I got the right module loaded. So I figured it could be > helpful for the interpretation of success/failure reports. Oh yeah, for testing, having it there is a good idea. > Assuming that this patch works for other people as well, what is > prefered: resending both patches or just to make a new #2/2 (the > vt6420 one)? I think just re-doing the second patch should be enough. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/