Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:03:19 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
       mingo@elte.hu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/40] arm,kgdb: Add hook to catch an oops with debugger
Message-ID: <20100120160319.GC27507@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <20100114174821.GB21385@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4B4F7EC2.6030000@windriver.com> <20100114204647.GE21385@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4B54706C.20202@windriver.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4B54706C.20202@windriver.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 555
Lines: 11

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 08:30:04AM -0600, Jason Wessel wrote:
> That being said, you patch works for the purpose of catching the
> exception and returning with or without the addition of an earlier
> return before bust_spinlocks() which I had proposed.

So does that mean I can have an acked-by for the patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/