Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753164Ab0ATTDj (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:03:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752108Ab0ATTDi (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:03:38 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:49367 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751477Ab0ATTDi (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:03:38 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: monstr@monstr.eu Subject: Re: Generic DMA - BUG_ON Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:03:12 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-14-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Joerg Roedel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michal.simek@petalogix.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu References: <1263982111-24123-1-git-send-email-monstr@monstr.eu> <20100120110031.GD8665@amd.com> <4B56E66C.50004@monstr.eu> In-Reply-To: <4B56E66C.50004@monstr.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001202003.13353.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/KhaxWLBhagVoFbNIOpAeHsxk32gLoxr9ySM7 MEgxVnrIWuK6kaRu31VD7f166Kfbcln7s6ssxgkLtvk+Ydk647 qcY39wCWgevuvI4QRb0Yg== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1487 Lines: 34 On Wednesday 20 January 2010, Michal Simek wrote: > Joerg Roedel wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:53:50AM +0000, Russell King wrote: > >> and ops is NULL, then this code will oops; you will get a full register > >> dump and backtrace. You can use this information along with markup_oops.pl > >> to find out where the problem is. > > > > You can't rely on the oops if the code runs in process context. The > > process may have address 0 mapped which would result in a security hole. > > We had two of these bugs last year. > > That's the same problem which I had some days ago and Microblaze misses > valuable backtrace (because we don't have FP or constant frame size). You can do what x86 does and just print anything in the stack that looks like part of a kernel function. > > But I don't see any point in checking for dma_ops != NULL too. Any > > developer would mention such a bug long before init is started. > > I agree that checking adds extra cycles to every dma-api call. > > I like as wrote Russel to check if ops exists or not. If you are worried about the overhead, you could just add the BUG_ON to the map calls but not to unmap and sync, which are rather unlikely (and incorrect) to be called before a map. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/