Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753302Ab0AUA4d (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:56:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751938Ab0AUA4c (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:56:32 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:50072 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751822Ab0AUA4c (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:56:32 -0500 Message-ID: <4B57A60E.5030306@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:55:42 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-4.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Christoph Lameter , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [x86] Unify semaphore_32.S and rwlock_64.S References: <4B56328E.9080108@zytor.com> <4B57641E.5060303@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2169 Lines: 55 On 01/20/2010 04:46 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> >> #define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE 0x00000000 >> #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS 0x00000001 >> #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK 0x3fffffff >> #define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (~RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) >> #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS >> #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS) > > Btw, doing that RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS cleanup (we currently have it as an > independent constant) means that now all constants are shared except for > that RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK. So it ends up being something like this: > > #ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_64bit > typedef __s64 rwsem_count_t; > #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK 0x3fffffff > #else > typedef __s32 rwsem_count_t; > #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK 0xffff > #endif > > #define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE 0x00000000 > #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS 0x00000001 > #define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (~RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) > #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS > #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS) > > with just that two-line difference for the 32-bit/64-bit case. > > At least I _think_ so. > Yes, I already had that change in my tree (or rather, I wrote it as (-RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK-1) to be consistent with what was previously there, but (~RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) makes more sense.) > And it's worth noting (again) that I didn't actually push the > twsem_count_t changes down into the slow-path code in lib/rwsem.c. There's > a few variables there that might need looking at too. I _think_ they are > all ok as-is (unlike the header file, lib/rwsem.c seems to consistently > use 'signed long' rather than mix 32-bit and 64-bit types), but it migh be > cleaner to make them rwsem_count_t's too. Yes, if we have it we should it consistently. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/