Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752635Ab0AUDCd (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:02:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751832Ab0AUDCc (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:02:32 -0500 Received: from smtp109.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([98.136.44.54]:45520 "HELO smtp109.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751696Ab0AUDCb (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:02:31 -0500 X-Yahoo-SMTP: OIJXglSswBDfgLtXluJ6wiAYv6_cnw-- X-YMail-OSG: Agdtw0AVM1kxAwj.PX2l4V6fPh7BhdXHjWzHzdKdRXAt3h70v7BpfOiTQWLehRq1lKmfvRkFe4QV8Oj.8wORYQFXi.DMOvs0seV.mmJtHw7OkbqXGTnewiVcwyfs4oy.nCvKx8qE_0Bq_N7C7cYhs9GcioMfo18Up2mSDWzSEskwu4uLglJJQfNl0hZAvYgJRMYmeDK8eZaX8zjdrC22PWP4vO_LfXVd7b2qfG9a9KwHuZ6X7YcZdRalFq2SmVjfFawlDqvtomZPtZxdIjJsCDdG6n298UhIzWH7C_fFktXco1HJbG7KpioAwCHQ91MFHWq8jwdeNL9mubnkiRRv2jqSVaG9QGcB1ZvYu9ByZUDhY5bSgbnQhvGA4mO_GeFoErfc.rlFrQsjFA-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4B57C3C3.9010606@schaufler-ca.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:02:27 -0800 From: Casey Schaufler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: zhou peng CC: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Casey Schaufler Subject: Re: About ACL for IPC Object References: <6fb445941001200112o2934f805l4eb4f78000e9527e@mail.gmail.com> <6fb445941001200120m3aa5e944j54a6f645ce82d76f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6fb445941001200120m3aa5e944j54a6f645ce82d76f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1311 Lines: 40 zhou peng wrote: > Hi all, > > There are ACL in file system, but why there are no ACL implementation > in IPC object, eg. shm, message queue, FIFO? > Most people haven't noticed that IPC objects are even there, much less that they have mode bits and not ACLs. Even when we were doing security evaluations on Unix boxes in the 1990's they were considered insufficiently interesting to justify the additional work to do ACLs. If you really want ACLs on IPC objects it would make a dandy little project for a summer. I would be happy to review patches. > Is there any fine grained granting in ipc object just like in file object? > As Stephen Smalley points out, you can do it with SELinux, although that it rather like driving a thumbtack with a bulldozer. > Thanks, > Best > > -- > zhoupeng > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/