Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755205Ab0AUKrq (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:47:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754912Ab0AUKrp (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:47:45 -0500 Received: from mgw1.diku.dk ([130.225.96.91]:58909 "EHLO mgw1.diku.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753142Ab0AUKro (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:47:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:47:41 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall To: Steven Rostedt Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH , Andy Whitcroft Subject: Re: Lots of bugs with current->state = TASK_*INTERRUPTIBLE In-Reply-To: <1263935333.4561.26.camel@frodo> Message-ID: References: <1263932978.31321.53.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1263935333.4561.26.camel@frodo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1314 Lines: 40 What about something like the following (drivers/macintosh/adb.c): add_wait_queue(&state->wait_queue, &wait); current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; for (;;) { req = state->completed; if (req != NULL) state->completed = req->next; else if (atomic_read(&state->n_pending) == 0) ret = -EIO; if (req != NULL || ret != 0) break; if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) { ret = -EAGAIN; break; } if (signal_pending(current)) { ret = -ERESTARTSYS; break; } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&state->lock, flags); schedule(); spin_lock_irqsave(&state->lock, flags); } current->state = TASK_RUNNING; remove_wait_queue(&state->wait_queue, &wait); There is a call to schedule eventually after the first current->state assignment, but it is not right after. thanks, julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/