DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=p7fehJ/ZrRTB7ndKV78EhCgS/LvJEU8KsGsWzTJ3GdGaU0Bv+rmZ/r2+flKbUEx3oT
         WnhHX8XOq20L9hrNRMsdBQOKTfclmz8TiZLU3hPJI+mQoemEgtxlym4uj3ausrHmxS7d
         5lwh15EBSuWuxiRblZhJuWxUWeuWnzb29uP+o=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <51f3faa70912271352g2784edc8oc899bd6def7b7275@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7c8826910912182213o2e0e8af7ic305f150c52e0618@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4B2C80DD.9080005@garzik.org> <4B2D1CF3.4070106@gmail.com>
	 <7c8826910912191437k4e1d93bap12874a6d6e0046d3@mail.gmail.com>
	 <51f3faa70912271352g2784edc8oc899bd6def7b7275@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:48:30 -0800
Message-ID: <7c8826911001211548l532a8f39y65b13b3ea4d0f93c@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.32 seemed to have broken nVidia MCP7A sata controller
From: Mike Cui <cuicui@gmail.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 3389
Lines: 76

I finally got a chance to try this on an x58 motherboard. It works
fine. It looks like the nvidia controller is the problem. Or maybe
it's just my motherboard.

Thanks.

On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Mike Cui <cuicui@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks, changing that one line fixed it. I can try to find an intel
>> motherboard sometime next week to see if it's the drive or the
>> controller.
>
> Hi Mike, did you ever get a chance to try this test?
>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 12/19/2009 01:29 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 12/19/2009 01:13 AM, Mike Cui wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have an nVidia MCP7A AHCI controller. I upgraded to 2.6.32.2 and my
>>>>> system deterministically freezes trying to mount file systems. Once in
>>>>> a while it will come back and finish booting after freezing for 1
>>>>> minute or 2. dmesg indicates that there were NCQ errors, but 2.6.31
>>>>> anb before has always worked flawlessly for me. What changed in
>>>>> 2.6.32? I will be more than happy to help track down this issue.
>>>>
>>>>> ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
>>>>> ata1.00: cmd 61/08:00:4f:ad:03/00:00:00:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 4096 out
>>>>> res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
>>>>> ata1: hard resetting link
>>>>> ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
>>>>> ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>>>> ata1.00: device reported invalid CHS sector 0
>>>>
>>>> Looks like things are timing out, and then go downhill from there. This
>>>> explanation of timeout gives some hints on possible causes:
>>>> http://ata.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Libata_error_messages#Error_classes
>>>>
>>>> The ideal would be if you could bisect between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32, to see
>>>> if it's a software change that is the cause.
>>>>
>>>> Looking at drivers/ata/ahci.c history, the only thing that -might- cause
>>>> problems is 388539f3ff0cf1de926b03f94e1eec112358f74d ('git show $commit'
>>>> for full commit info and diff).
>>>
>>> I suspect that as well (it's the commit that adds FPDMA auto-activate on DMA
>>> setup FIS support). Your drive indicates it's supported but it's possible
>>> it's broken on that drive or the controller. If the drive doesn't set the
>>> activate bit in the DMA setup FIS properly or the controller doesn't respect
>>> it, then FPDMA requests will stall.
>>>
>>> Mike, can you try and revert that patch, or else just change this line in
>>> drivers/ata/ahci.c:
>>>
>>>                pi.flags |= ATA_FLAG_NCQ | ATA_FLAG_FPDMA_AA;
>>>
>>> to
>>>
>>>                pi.flags |= ATA_FLAG_NCQ;
>>>
>>> and rebuild and see if it works better?
>>>
>>> I tend to suspect the controller is the problem (I've got WD drives that
>>> work fine with AA on Intel AHCI, though it could be model-specific). I guess
>>> the only way to verify for sure which one it is would be if someone else had
>>> that particular drive model on a different AHCI controller and could verify
>>> if it worked with 2.6.32+ or not.
>>>
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/