Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755788Ab0AVRLv (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:11:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755174Ab0AVRLu (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:11:50 -0500 Received: from saraswathi.solana.com ([198.99.130.12]:54067 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754951Ab0AVRLt (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:11:49 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:11:45 -0500 From: Jeff Dike To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Am=E9rico?= Wang Cc: Dimitry Golubovsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Current status of UML development? Message-ID: <20100122171145.GA13074@c2.user-mode-linux.org> References: <20100122162356.GA4771@hack> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20100122162356.GA4771@hack> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 863 Lines: 20 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:23:56AM +0800, Am?rico Wang wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 03:27:58PM -0500, Dimitry Golubovsky wrote: > >I am learning/experimenting with UML internals, and am curious what is > >the current status of its development? Has UML become stable enough so > >it does not need any improvement (at least for i386), or has its > >development just ceased in favor of other virtualization techniques? > > > > Of course not. This is being generous. I haven't really done any work on UML in the last year or so, although bugs are found and patches contributed (by Am?rico, among others). Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/