Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753885Ab0AVUPH (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:15:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753819Ab0AVUPG (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:15:06 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f220.google.com ([209.85.220.220]:33961 "EHLO mail-fx0-f220.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753397Ab0AVUPE (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:15:04 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=kapVglIenjEWe7f76nME7vDXiMDKKxj2/BS57qDP63bszGy6upmtqgufW/hyegLrAO vCSLDI/dOsFurnsf9e8AMBW94LELjCmXQYbCi3HbVfIKkbTAvepkpTA+nzwNQ6TTZ6h0 /SnjVqqTuKgY4mIZiAMum0APQ1FTLNf61/YKs= From: Luca Zini To: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: scheduler vs hardware? (was Re: another i7 (linux) bug?) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:15:00 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.33-rc5-mio; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: aagaande@gmail.com, rdelcueto@hotmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, "linux-kernel" , Alex Chiang References: <201001211258.23499.luca.zini@gmail.com> <20100121215438.GK17684@ldl.fc.hp.com> <1264144758.8074.22.camel@marge.simson.net> In-Reply-To: <1264144758.8074.22.camel@marge.simson.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001222115.00707.luca.zini@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1295 Lines: 42 vanilla 33-rc5 runs ok: with nice set to -20 real 0m8.649s user 0m8.600s sys 0m0.030s with nice set to 19: real 0m8.658s user 0m8.600s sys 0m0.040s thank you! Luca On Friday 22 January 2010 08:19:18 am Mike Galbraith wrote: > > if I run a cpu intensive process with the lowest priority (19 > > from man nice) I obtain much better performance that with the > > highest priority available (-20 from man nice). > > > > For example the same file is processed by lame in 8.7 seconds > > at the lowest priority, and in 12 seconds at the highest > > priority. Before posting a bug I wold like to understand if > > this is a problem related to the i7 mobile (my processor is a > > i7 Q720). > > > > As far as I tested on the same laptop series (dell studio 15), > > with the same kernel this problem does not exists. > > So you only see this on the i7. That's odd. Can you try 33-rc5? > > Posting a reliable reproducer would be nice. It'd also be nice to see > what all is running when you see this, and where. > > -Mike > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/