Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:08:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:08:02 -0400 Received: from ip68-13-184-34.om.om.cox.net ([68.13.184.34]:29182 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:08:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 10:05:09 -0600 (CST) From: Thomas Molina X-X-Sender: tmolina@localhost.localdomain To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux as a minicomputer ? In-Reply-To: <20020414165056.GJ16692@gallifrey> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > OK, clearing aside the deep technical arguments about lengths of coax > and what you can do with a couple of celerons, it seems obvious to me > that for at least some menial jobs a box with multiple separate screens > is useful. (Think two or three secretarys sitting next to each other > with a PC in the middle, low processor needs, short leads). Actually, it's not just about simple component cost. There are other considerations, especially in a business environment. I actually did a paper for my technical writing class a year ago and found the best solution was cheap terminals connected to a good, single-processor server. Target environment for the study was a 10-workstation medical services company here in Omaha. SMP didn't turn out to be the most cost effective solution, much to my surprise. Key question is how much does it cost if data is compromised or lost, and how much does it cost to ensure that bad things don't happen. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/