Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:18:15 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
       dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume
 if KMS is used
Message-ID: <20100124001815.48b4eb9c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <201001240055.59479.rjw@sisk.pl>
References: <201001240055.59479.rjw@sisk.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 619
Lines: 15

> I've been testing this patch for over a week and haven't seen a single problem
> related to it during this time.
> 
> Are there any objections to it?

Usual question 8) - explain the locking. What happens if we suspend as
kms is initialising/being removed.

Also what happens if you have KMS and non KMS consoles both active
through the frame buffer off different cards ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/