Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 23:44:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 23:44:32 -0500 Received: from wire.cadcamlab.org ([156.26.20.181]:38661 "EHLO wire.cadcamlab.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 23:44:19 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 22:13:47 -0600 To: "Jeff V. Merkey" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Message-ID: <20001207221347.R6567@cadcamlab.org> In-Reply-To: <3A30552D.A6BE248C@timpanogas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A30552D.A6BE248C@timpanogas.org>; from jmerkey@timpanogas.org on Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 08:27:41PM -0700 From: Peter Samuelson Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Jeff Merkey] > Do folks not know this NTFS driver will trash hard drives? We need > to alert folks DO NOT USE WRITE NTFS MODE in those versions we know > are busted. Here's an idea: let's make r/w support a separate CONFIG option, and label it "DANGEROUS". Oh wait, we already do that. Perhaps we should warn users to back up their NTFS partitions before trying this option. Put that warning in the help text for CONFIG_NTFS_RW. Oh wait, we already do that too. How stupid does one have to be in order to enable an option labeled "DANGEROUS" for a non-experimental system? Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/