Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 17:45:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 17:45:50 -0400 Received: from e21.nc.us.ibm.com ([32.97.136.227]:51189 "EHLO e21.nc.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 17:45:49 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Hubertus Franke Reply-To: frankeh@watson.ibm.com Organization: IBM Research To: Mark Mielke Subject: Re: [PATCH] Futex Generalization Patch Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 16:46:24 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: Bill Abt , drepper@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin.Wirth@dlr.de, Peter =?iso-8859-1?q?W=E4chtler?= , Rusty Russell In-Reply-To: <20020415172204.4B6073FE08@smtp.linux.ibm.com> <20020415165740.A28056@mark.mielke.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20020415214532.1F3553FE06@smtp.linux.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 15 April 2002 04:57 pm, Mark Mielke wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:22:59PM -0400, Hubertus Franke wrote: > > typedef struct siginfo { > > ... > > union { > > int _pad[SI_PAD_SIZE]; > > > > struct { > > ... > > } _kill; > > ... > > > > I'd suggest we tag along the _sigfault semantics. > > We don't need to know who woke us up, just which got signalled. > > Is there issues with creating a new struct in the union that represents > exactly what you wish it to represent? > > mark No, but then again there seems to be no need either. All we need is the that is to be woken up, which carries similarity to a SEGV signal handler. -- -- Hubertus Franke (frankeh@watson.ibm.com) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/