Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753884Ab0AYWPg (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:15:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752707Ab0AYWPf (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:15:35 -0500 Received: from mail-px0-f182.google.com ([209.85.216.182]:59256 "EHLO mail-px0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751502Ab0AYWPd (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:15:33 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Knt/INWGjXijf7EU1umQ/uuNCe9oHIkz7vnNuXOVtKGpgA+LJUhhR0njtOf6YOjQ8I Vufu01+gufgsgCo+c83vqQ6Sqm2xpENbJtyExvs6B7RKBwRH2nGf3Qyoc41LWv46Pa4c YBGL5MvZZeX8H4Si6SawLbVueW/tM/7tZZ/Go= Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:15:20 -0800 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Vojtech Pavlik , Robert Hancock , Bastien Nocera , linux-kernel , pjones@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable i8042 checks on Intel Apple Macs Message-ID: <20100125221520.GA30307@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <1264011793.1735.3683.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4B57A2D4.9030204@gmail.com> <20100121185544.GB11996@core.coreip.homeip.net> <51f3faa71001211339t4652700ct34659c37479cd67e@mail.gmail.com> <20100121221701.GA15293@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20100125163433.GB31957@suse.cz> <4B5E0DFA.8080705@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B5E0DFA.8080705@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1384 Lines: 35 On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:32:42PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 01/25/2010 08:34 AM, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > > > Thus I believe that the right fix here is to figure out why the accesses > > to the ports 0x60/0x64 take a long time or forever on a Mac. Is it just > > that the kernel is timing out waiting for the i8042? Or is it something > > more sinister? > > > > In the A20 code in the setup code, I look for 0xFF coming back and > terminate the "wait for ready" loop much sooner than for other values. > 0xFF is a *possible* status value, but not a very *likely* one > (especially for repeated reads), as it would represent: > > parity error + receive timeout + transmit timeout + keyboard lock + > command + selftest OK + input full + output full. > You allow up to 32 0xFFs while i8042 driver does maximum 16 reads of whatever - if OBF is still raised we assume i8042 is not there. Does that mean that reads from 0x60 is what hurts on Macs? Bastien, could you try modifying drivers/input/serio/i8042.c:: i8042_flush() to not call i8042_read_data() when str is 0xff and see if it helps with lockups? Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/