Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752941Ab0AYWTI (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:19:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752380Ab0AYWTF (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:19:05 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:60046 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751759Ab0AYWTC (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:19:02 -0500 Message-ID: <4B5E18C0.7060402@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:18:40 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-4.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Torokhov CC: Vojtech Pavlik , Robert Hancock , Bastien Nocera , linux-kernel , pjones@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable i8042 checks on Intel Apple Macs References: <1264011793.1735.3683.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4B57A2D4.9030204@gmail.com> <20100121185544.GB11996@core.coreip.homeip.net> <51f3faa71001211339t4652700ct34659c37479cd67e@mail.gmail.com> <20100121221701.GA15293@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20100125163433.GB31957@suse.cz> <4B5E0DFA.8080705@zytor.com> <20100125221520.GA30307@core.coreip.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20100125221520.GA30307@core.coreip.homeip.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1530 Lines: 38 On 01/25/2010 02:15 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:32:42PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 01/25/2010 08:34 AM, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: >>> >>> Thus I believe that the right fix here is to figure out why the accesses >>> to the ports 0x60/0x64 take a long time or forever on a Mac. Is it just >>> that the kernel is timing out waiting for the i8042? Or is it something >>> more sinister? >>> >> >> In the A20 code in the setup code, I look for 0xFF coming back and >> terminate the "wait for ready" loop much sooner than for other values. >> 0xFF is a *possible* status value, but not a very *likely* one >> (especially for repeated reads), as it would represent: >> >> parity error + receive timeout + transmit timeout + keyboard lock + >> command + selftest OK + input full + output full. >> > > You allow up to 32 0xFFs while i8042 driver does maximum 16 reads of > whatever - if OBF is still raised we assume i8042 is not there. Does > that mean that reads from 0x60 is what hurts on Macs? > > Bastien, could you try modifying drivers/input/serio/i8042.c:: > i8042_flush() to not call i8042_read_data() when str is 0xff and see if > it helps with lockups? > We should never read from port 0x60 unless bit 1 in port 0x64 is set. Do we do that? -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/