Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 00:21:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 00:21:28 -0500 Received: from vger.timpanogas.org ([207.109.151.240]:48132 "EHLO vger.timpanogas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 00:21:16 -0500 Message-ID: <3A30678E.D0D3272C@timpanogas.org> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 21:46:06 -0700 From: "Jeff V. Merkey" Organization: TRG, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caperry@edolnx.net CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel Development Documentation? In-Reply-To: <3A3066A5.7E173772@edolnx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Carl Perry wrote: > > I was reading an article today on Slashdot about how poorly documented the > Windows API was and had this fear that Linux could get the same way. So, cut to > the point: Whoever posted this on Slashdot is smoking some killer dope or something. The Windows API is very well documented via online docs from MSDN -- better than most software anywhere in the world. Whoever said this was high or something or ignorant or never had an MSDN subscription. I used to get 20-40 CD's a month from MS on a Universal Subscription, with enormous documentation.. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/