Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 22:32:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 22:32:35 -0400 Received: from ool-182d14cd.dyn.optonline.net ([24.45.20.205]:2824 "HELO osinvestor.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 22:32:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 22:32:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Rob Radez X-X-Sender: To: cc: Marcelo Tosatti , "David S. Miller" Subject: [RFC] Making drivers/char/watchdog Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This e-mail probably doesn't affect 99% of you out there, but it's coming into your inboxes anyways :-). How would people feel about moving the 22 watchdog drivers into their own subdirectory off of drivers/char/ in both 2.4 and 2.5? (Well, 2.5 only has 18 at the moment, but I'm planning on adding the 4 2.4-only drivers to 2.5 once updating 2.4 is done) I've received a bunch of inquiries about breaking them into their own subdirectory. At the moment there are 20 watchdog drivers in drivers/char/ and 2 in drivers/sbus/char/ in 2.4, and 16 in drivers/char/ and 2 in drivers/sbus/char/ in 2.5. I think putting them all into one place will make them easier to maintain, more standardized, and less buggy. Regards, Rob Radez - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/