Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753241Ab0AZPav (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:30:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752611Ab0AZPav (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:30:51 -0500 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:45820 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752539Ab0AZPau (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:30:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:29:24 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Himanshu Chauhan Cc: Himanshu Chauhan , Linux Kernel , Kernel Newbies Subject: Re: sysfs_ops show vector: size of buffer not required? Message-ID: <20100126152924.GA3204@kroah.com> References: <20100124074118.GA4201@himanshu-laptop> <20100126043646.GB32066@kroah.com> <20100126063127.GA2369@himanshu-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100126063127.GA2369@himanshu-laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1385 Lines: 40 On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:01:27PM +0530, Himanshu Chauhan wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:36:46PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:11:18PM +0530, Himanshu Chauhan wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > The sysfs_ops's show vector doesn't have a size of the > > > buffer given to the vector, while store on the other hand > > > has. What is the rationale behind it? > > > > If you need to check the size, you are doing something wrong. > > > > Seriously, that is the reason. A sysfs file should be a single value, > > which will never overflow the buffer. > > > I was talking in context of usb/ip's show_status. It writes a lot of data > into this buffer. Then it needs to be fixed. Again, it must be, one value per file, that is the sysfs rule. > Which seems to over flow the buffer. But anyways, I will check if it > can be reduced or at least be splitted into differnt device > attributes. That would be great. > BTW, Greg, Did you take a look at other patches I had sent? Are are worth or > I need rework? They are in my "to-apply" queue that I will be flushing out in the next few days. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/