Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754197Ab0AZPiK (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:38:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753813Ab0AZPiJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:38:09 -0500 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:53119 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753636Ab0AZPiI (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:38:08 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:37:59 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Jean Delvare Cc: Ben Dooks , Uwe Kleine-Koenig , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms Message-ID: <20100126153759.GF4431@pengutronix.de> References: <1264411234-5400-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20100125111055.05ccedf2@hyperion.delvare> <20100126143830.GC12774@fluff.org.uk> <20100126162515.230bdf36@hyperion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100126162515.230bdf36@hyperion.delvare> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:221:70ff:fe71:1890 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: w.sang@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1357 Lines: 47 --HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > So I see no objection to a mass move of all embedded/system i2c bus > drivers to a separate sub-directory. And with the PCA9xxx-controllers? The ISA-driver into non-embedded and the platform-driver into embedded? Hmmm... And (in 80 years ;)) there might be just one I2C-maintainer taking care of = them all? Then, why the split? I am all for taking the embedded-burden away from you, just I am not too fo= nd of this idea. Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktfDFcACgkQD27XaX1/VRvBdACdGcOB7kKbnYutaSkD/VYAGuDg lOUAnjCn6z2Zpug5h1anrHaQu1/eOLhE =wUUR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/