Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754667Ab0AZQTU (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:19:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754638Ab0AZQTU (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:19:20 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:62712 "EHLO mail-pw0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752103Ab0AZQTT (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:19:19 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=XmwVoluCfV35MGDv1xXlWrzTx88gAT/MIxIfyNDBRH8AZuDnusLqdfe1XVemM0kqhx KkjN8zTF8x8/pLHSO+eap1P5t+vBJmJkCq2isVu2H3potv2xw3+pfa65m0FBF86Xu6PP goHxNvN26map4Be0LyY7C0WdQkTHv1SkoWG+Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100126160243.018b87e3@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> References: <20100126160243.018b87e3@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:49:18 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: Disable NCQ for Crucial M225 brand SSDs From: Vishal Rao To: Alan Cox Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trivial@kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1217 Lines: 32 2010/1/26 Alan Cox : >> Should work with 64, 128 (tested) and 256 GB capacities with any >> firmware versions in >> drivers/ata/libata-core.c because of ATA errors in dmesg, hangs and >> filesystem corruption. > > If you've only tested one type why list all three ? Also you've not > listed a firmware version so do you know which are affected ? > > What controllers did you test with ? > > Alan > The 3 IDs should match I believe and the firmware parameter is NULL. Affected firmware versions include at least the latest 1916 and the previous 1819, likely older ones as well. Tested with my own Crucial CT128M225 model which has the IndiLinx Barefoot controller. The libata-core.c file has an existing line for "OCZ_CORESSD" for a particular firmware version but I suspect many, if not all of those controllers may have this issue? At least one user of Intel SSDs reports no issues with existing kernels and I've read that they do NCQ right. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/