Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 00:27:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 00:27:48 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:47368 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 00:27:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 01:27:26 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Mike Fedyk Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , William Lee Irwin III , Linus Torvalds , Subject: Re: [PATCH] for_each_zone / for_each_pgdat In-Reply-To: <20020416013016.GA23513@matchmail.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 02:44:58AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 04:20:58PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > > I won't scream too loud, but I think it's pretty much done right as is. > > Regardless if that's the cleaner implementation or not, I don't see much > the point of merging those cleanups in 2.4 right now: it won't make any > functional difference to users and it's only a self contained code > cleanup, while other patches that make a runtime difference aren't > merged yet. Sorry to say it, but if you want patches to be merged, why don't you submit them ? regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/