Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755456Ab0AZXy5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:54:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755388Ab0AZXxy (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:53:54 -0500 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]:8722 "EHLO sj-iport-5.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755019Ab0AZXxv (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:53:51 -0500 Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEACsPX0urRN+J/2dsb2JhbADCdZcnhDcE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,348,1262563200"; d="scan'208";a="140462753" From: Roland Dreier To: Alex Chiang Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, justin.chen@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: infiniband limit of 32 cards per system? References: <20100125235013.GD2828@grease.ALLEYCAT> <20100126035906.GA23347@ldl.fc.hp.com> <20100126213803.GA12035@ldl.fc.hp.com> X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:52:52 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20100126213803.GA12035@ldl.fc.hp.com> (Alex Chiang's message of "Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:38:03 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jan 2010 23:52:53.0719 (UTC) FILETIME=[AD162E70:01CA9EE2] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 419 Lines: 12 > I take it this concern is what prevents us from simply increasing > IB_UVERBS_MAX_DEVICES to 64 or something? Yes, I think then the device numbers will overlap. - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/