Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 04:15:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 04:15:42 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:57488 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 04:15:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 01:14:53 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Olaf Fraczyk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ? Message-ID: <20020416081453.GP21206@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Olaf Fraczyk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020416074748.GA16657@venus.local.navi.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: brief message Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 09:47:48AM +0200, Olaf Fraczyk wrote: > Hi, > I would like to know why exactly this value was choosen. > Is it safe to change it to eg. 1024? Will it break anything? > What else should I change to get it working: > CLOCKS_PER_SEC? > Please CC me. > Regards, > Olaf Fraczyk I tried a few times running with HZ == 1024 for some testing (or I guess just to see what happened). I didn't see any problems, even without the obscure CLOCKS_PER_SEC ELF business. Cheers, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/