Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753930Ab0A0AVV (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:21:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753671Ab0A0AVU (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:21:20 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:41112 "EHLO mail-pw0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753653Ab0A0AVT (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:21:19 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Mib8ns7D4bWuYIF2Nvip+s0eMlhIwuBtXAzW/z59IGpu0BPwl/d80Kp9Dk7CHk3B0B ti87wjSEVZncmGX920jDoL//xycCtOCDWdfmiN7pf5iR3VDbbMP2REMLo36yK36eFD0z a9PwwKU01cR5RqH+iKfGJfDmzEEJdY0viyfuc= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <72dbd3151001261251s606ebf00h86c2ce63293305b6@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100126160243.018b87e3@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <72dbd3151001261251s606ebf00h86c2ce63293305b6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:51:17 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: Disable NCQ for Crucial M225 brand SSDs From: Vishal Rao To: David Rees Cc: Alan Cox , jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trivial@kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1227 Lines: 27 2010/1/27 David Rees : > Have there been any other reports of NCQ issues with similar Crucial > drives or Indilinx? I haven't personally seen reports of NCQ specific issues. I have seen people (online) reporting "issues" with Linux distro installations hanging/freezing etc. and some prior attempts at SMART fixes which I also initially tried but did not work for me. I have tried to "publicise" this issue (forum, blog, mailing list posts) in the hope more users may search and identify the correct issue so that it may be better verified. Unfortunately, the Crucial ID string is not model-agnostic (if thats the right term)... meaning the patch has 3 lines to ID the 3 current models that I know of including my own 128 GB model. Not sure if there's a better, more generic way to match a whole group of SSDs (same model family or various vendors) which trigger NCQ errors? -- "Thou shalt not follow the null pointer for at its end madness and chaos lie." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/