DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=tVBt3t0Dbi07P4N8KZgKwvJHuQ1XsQscRM64MqYTEVc96ccBlDngmC7gLc1NMdLa7c
         v8OGqD6rsWzuJrWYFlDUVnFfMpHVoQZYZXcmpkA4ma9Ht64wIoSgKqGY9VDXC36QAHVX
         oxZPBnRqsxFEh7RpDXtluOxsKlPP4/Dzd/vbM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20100127010204.7976c38b@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
References: <aacba7e1001260704m27c99a0dy6c3f50c38ce6b430@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20100126160243.018b87e3@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
	 <aacba7e1001260819k24088c81m14b4c702fccddd29@mail.gmail.com>
	 <72dbd3151001261251s606ebf00h86c2ce63293305b6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <aacba7e1001261621v6abb4270i996a28d19c9f7d7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <72dbd3151001261632t7bbe43d0nb7490eae02185c81@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20100127010204.7976c38b@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:44:10 +0530
Message-ID: <aacba7e1001261714n42a68824k62c411cd1e5d7893@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: Disable NCQ for Crucial M225 brand SSDs
From: Vishal Rao <vishalrao@gmail.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: David Rees <drees76@gmail.com>, jgarzik@pobox.com,
       linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       trivial@kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1246
Lines: 23

2010/1/27 Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>:
> It could even be a Linux side bug or some kind of complicated Linux
> timing thing. That *has* happened before with the older IDE stack, so we
> need to be cautious, collect reports and try to see patterns before
> jumping to conclusions - unless the vendor advises us otherwise.

Good, I'm hoping you folks have better clout in soliciting responses from
users and vendors. In the mean time that I'm going to take a couple of
days to find the time to test on a different machine, here is a month-old
output of "dmesg | grep ata1" if it helps any:

http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/347122/

I'm running Ubuntu Lucid 10.04 alphas at the moment and note that even
if I "successfully reproduce" the problem on my alternate hardware, its
still the same particular disk which can't disprove that it's simply a
single defective piece - the only thing stuck in my mind is Win7rc working
fine so far while various other Linux distros have exhibited the same problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/