Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753862Ab0A0EvU (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:51:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753726Ab0A0EvT (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:51:19 -0500 Received: from mail-yx0-f188.google.com ([209.85.210.188]:46883 "EHLO mail-yx0-f188.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753706Ab0A0EvT convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:51:19 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=B2bFFvTcxYeFJzVfdx4d/tWK+hKghqHcbzYlhZsRip2x62wsfRj9+oeiiolTHtaHrC Fa4DHjtY35jwebjr9qR0koTjLLLs0DJxsDWrKhk67kthNb0uZ1zBv89Yd9nmXQE/7C5x mG6VOMykPgvoC5wk6a0mDNBM0xm1Me4feGhRw= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1264170977.31321.382.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> References: <1264167826-20913-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <1264170977.31321.382.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> From: Mike Frysinger Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:50:58 -0500 Message-ID: <8bd0f97a1001262050g1b6ce455o4b767251c8bebc95@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: unify arch_syscall_addr() implementations To: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Hendrik Brueckner , "David S. Miller" , Heiko Carstens , Paul Mundt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1106 Lines: 24 On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:36, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 08:43 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> Every arch_syscall_addr() implementation thus far is the same, so unify >> them as a default weak in common code so more arches don't have to waste >> time copying & pasting this simple function.  The Blackfin version is >> going to be exactly the same. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger >> --- >> note: only thing that needs double checking is s390 and sparc where they >> declared the sys_call_table as an array of ints.  considering this table >> is supposed to be an array of function pointers, this seems like more of >> a typo to me ... > > I would not be too sure. s390 is very strange, and I would definitely > want to get an Ack from the arch maintainers first. i think everyone has checked in with v3 ... -mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/