Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754197Ab0A0K3h (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:29:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754023Ab0A0K3g (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:29:36 -0500 Received: from e23smtp06.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.148]:41421 "EHLO e23smtp06.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752752Ab0A0K3f (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:29:35 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:59:23 +0530 From: "K.Prasad" To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Jan Kiszka , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Alan Stern Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 2/2][Bugfix][x86][hw-breakpoint] Fix return-code to notifier chain in hw_breakpoint_handler Message-ID: <20100127102923.GB3460@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20091226182833.GC9494@in.ibm.com> <20091231003808.GC23808@nowhere> <20091231190217.GC3676@in.ibm.com> <20100110031857.GB15195@nowhere> <4B4B78D1.2080606@siemens.com> <20100116194058.GA31079@in.ibm.com> <20100120060159.GA4859@in.ibm.com> <4B596C8E.2020600@siemens.com> <20100122092127.GB7127@in.ibm.com> <20100125222139.GF5087@nowhere> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100125222139.GF5087@nowhere> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1282 Lines: 43 On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:21:41PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 02:51:27PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: > > > >> Such a behaviour shouldn't be affected by the above change...your > > > >> confirmation would help! > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Jan, > > > > I presume that the above explanation makes the role of this > > > > patch/bugfix clear. > > > > > > > > Kindly let me know if you have any further queries. > > > > > > > > > > Nope. There should be really no conflicts of your optimization with kvm. > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > -- > > > > Hi Jan, > > Thanks for the confirmation. > > > > Hi Frederic, > > Can you pull these fixes in? (LKML references: > > 20091226182725.GB9494@in.ibm.com and 20091226182833.GC9494@in.ibm.com). > > > I got a deeper look at these patches and answered with some comments. > > If you address these, I can apply for .34 (because it's about optimizations > and not fixes). > Sure, please apply them against a version that you deem appropriate. Thanks, K.Prasad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/