Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:36:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:36:01 -0400 Received: from swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.123]:60898 "EHLO swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:36:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:42:23 -0400 To: joe@tmsusa.com, akpm@zip.com.au Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.8 final - another data point Message-ID: <20020416084223.A1817@rushmore> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i From: rwhron@earthlink.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>Patience. 2.5.later-on will perform well. :) > It's already quite usable for some workloads, and the > latency for workstation use is quite good - I am looking > forward to the maturation of this diamond in the rough I noticed a dbench regression in 2.5.8 too. The light at the end of the tunnel looks bright and close though. :) (reference to near-death experience - not a train. :) Running dbench 128 on ext2 mounted with delalloc and Andrew's patches from http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.8/ was 7.5x faster than 2.5.8 vanilla and 1.5x faster than 2.4.19pre6aa1. It will be fun to see what the other i/o benchmarks and OSDB do with Andrew's delalloc patches. -- Randy Hron - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/