Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 09:40:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 09:40:54 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:40196 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 09:40:53 -0400 Subject: Re: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ? To: terje.eggestad@scali.com (Terje Eggestad) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 14:58:33 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (linux-kernel), l_girdwood@bitwise.co.uk (Liam Girdwood), balbir.singh@wipro.com (BALBIR SINGH), olaf@navi.pl (William Olaf Fraczyk), wli@holomorphy.com (Lee Irwin III) In-Reply-To: <1018964120.13527.37.camel@pc-16.office.scali.no> from "Terje Eggestad" at Apr 16, 2002 03:35:19 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I seem to recall from theory that the 100HZ is human dependent. Any > higher and you would begin to notice delays from you input until > whatever program you're talking to responds. Ultimately its because Linus pulled that number out of a hat about ten years ago. For some workloads 1KHz is much better, for others like giant number crunching people actually drop it down to about 5.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/