Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756183Ab0A1NvO (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:51:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755944Ab0A1NvO (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:51:14 -0500 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:57624 "EHLO ironport2-out.pppoe.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932208Ab0A1NvN (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:51:13 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjQBAJskYUtLd/sX/2dsb2JhbAAIgy/HPoIZAY1DgSqCOVkE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,359,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="54736741" Message-ID: <4B61964F.6060307@teksavvy.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:51:11 -0500 From: Mark Lord User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Mel Gorman , Linux Kernel , Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: 2.6.32.5 regression: page allocation failure. order:1, References: <4B5FA147.5040802@teksavvy.com> <4B610FDA.50104@teksavvy.com> <4B6113C7.201@teksavvy.com> <201001281152.20352.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <201001281152.20352.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1243 Lines: 34 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Have you attached a (2.6.31.x) dmesg output from the failing box somewhere > or have I just missed it? .. The log from failing on 2.6.32.5 was linked to originally: http://rtr.ca/2.6.32_page_alloc_fail_logs.txt Here's the subsequent revert reboot back to 2.6.32.12: http://rtr.ca/2.6.31.12_ok_logs.txt In the time available thus far, I haven't managed to get 2.6.32.5 to boot/run on anything else, using either a UP kernel, or "nosmp", along with "mem=512M". With a bit of luck, I'll have another similar VIA C7 box delivered here by tonight, and should be able to boot/run that off a cloned disk image from the original system. Then we can poke at things a bit more. If the box works, it will be 100% at our disposal. Note that it's far too slow for practical direct use of git-bisect, taking hours to rebuild its own kernels. It might be possible, with a fair bit of effort, to arrange a quad-core box to do the kernel compiles for it, though. Cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/