Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755936Ab0A1QBJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:01:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755615Ab0A1QBI (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:01:08 -0500 Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:41545 "EHLO khc.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755493Ab0A1QBI (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:01:08 -0500 From: Krzysztof Halasa To: Stefani Seibold Cc: linux-kernel , Andrew Morton , apw@canonical.com, jschopp@austin.ibm.com, davej@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: remove the 80 charactes punch card limit References: <1264597747.3607.29.camel@wall-e> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:01:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1264597747.3607.29.camel@wall-e> (Stefani Seibold's message of "Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:09:07 +0100") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 731 Lines: 18 Stefani Seibold writes: > The time of 80 characters punch card and terminals are over, so i would > be a good thing to set the line length limit to 120. Every display today > should be able handle this. I thought it's been already agreed that the limit is lifted altogether? Not even the 132 that was considered by some people sane enough. The other thing is that fine "code complexity", but I think checkpatch can't check it ATM, can it? -- Krzysztof Halasa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/