Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756119Ab0A2PjK (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:39:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754189Ab0A2PjJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:39:09 -0500 Received: from MAIL.IHTFP.ORG ([204.107.200.6]:39432 "EHLO mail.ihtfp.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753847Ab0A2PjI (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:39:08 -0500 From: Derek Atkins To: Rik van Riel , Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo Subject: Re: Re-enabling non-GPL driver access to disk partition information References: <4B62FA46.9080602@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:38:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B62FA46.9080602@redhat.com> (Rik van Riel's message of "Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:09:58 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2067 Lines: 53 Hi, Rik van Riel writes: > RCU is patented, with permission for GPL code to use the algorithm. > > Exposing RCU bits to non-GPL modules would be rather pointless, since > those don't have permission (from IBM, the RCU patent holder) to use > RCU, anyway. I'm neither asking for or suggesting non-GPL access to RCU. Rather I'm asking for non-GPL access to genhd partition information. In particular I'm looking for: - # of actual partitions (which I used to obtain by iterating the table and counting -- yes, I know, gross) - for each partition: * partition start sector * partition size Alan Cox writes: >> get information about existing partitions. All those interfaces are now >> GPL-Only, > > The kernel is GPL licensed. Please don't assume an EXPORT_SYMBOL() means > the GPL does not apply or that this magically indicates it isn't a > derivative work. I'm not making that assumption, and the lawyers involved have made that very very clear. (I've spent more time in meetings with lawyers in the past month than I have working on code). However, that's why I'm just asking for EXPORT_SYMBOL() instead of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(), because I'm not sure I can license my module under the GPL (although it can be released under other licenses, but that doesn't give me access to GPL-Only symbols). I'd prefer to be able to access the partition objects directly as I had been doing for a couple years. However I do have other alternatives if this patch (or something like it) wont be accepted. -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH warlord@MIT.EDU PGP key available -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/