Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 12:06:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 12:05:39 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:49680 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 12:04:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 09:01:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Alan Cox cc: Vojtech Pavlik , Martin Dalecki , Richard Gooch , David Lang , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 36 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > Please use a the network block device, and teach the ndb deamon to just > > byteswap each word. > > You need to use loop not nbd - loopback nbd can deadlock. Byteswap as a > new revolutionary crypto system for the loopback driver isnt hard Even better - I did indeed miss the "security" aspect of the byteswapping ;) And I know from personal experience that allowing partitioning of a loopback thing would certainly have made some things a _lot_ easier (ie not having to figure out the damn offsets in order to mount a filesystem on a loopback volume), so having support for partitioning would be good. Although I do have this suspicion that that partitioning support should be in user space (along with all the rest of the partitioning support, but that's another matter and has some rather more serious backwards compatibility issues, of course. Is anybody still working on the new early initrd?). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/