Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 15:34:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 15:34:43 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:31496 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 15:34:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 21:33:04 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Andrew Morton Cc: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: readahead Message-ID: <20020416193304.GV1097@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <3CBC7A41.384FD032@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 16 2002, Andrew Morton wrote: > Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote: > > > > ... > > Do these cards not have a request queue? > > > > The kernel views them as SCSI disks. > > So yes, I can do > > > > blockdev --setra 0 /dev/sdc > > > > Unfortunately that does not help in the least. > > Indeed, the only user of the readahead info is > > readahead.c: get_max_readahead() and it does > > > > blk_ra_kbytes = blk_get_readahead(inode->i_dev) / 2; > > if (blk_ra_kbytes < VM_MIN_READAHEAD) > > blk_ra_kbytes = VM_MAX_READAHEAD; > > > > We need to distinguish between undefined, and explicily zero. > > Yup. The below (untested) patch should fix it up. Assuming > that all drivers use blk_init_queue(), and heaven knows if > that's the case. If not, the readahead window will have to be set it in blk_queue_make_request(), please. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/