Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755708Ab0AOElO (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:41:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750984Ab0AOElN (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:41:13 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f194.google.com ([209.85.221.194]:51775 "EHLO mail-qy0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750695Ab0AOElL convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:41:11 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Zb7b8/FhptlewgDPQym6hM4hTr8u++a3ogw++dw2QiYDerMuh+ZNna73bpCAURSYsc iI5lmHRsN2o3NVV+CN1hyc+8Vx2BhTPW4IITVYJP/pcFXY4c0xpbfJSDiy+Eh/mgPd05 V0hNgXPFWcdKSPwf8QIcqaUmQSliDnYDYzfjw= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20091202141458.12819.96170.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> References: <20091202141452.12819.93536.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> <20091202141458.12819.96170.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:41:10 -0800 Message-ID: <6a12d2f31001142041j7f917b07l1e1a728790175321@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] fanotify: Add pids to events From: Matthew Helsley To: Eric Paris Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hch@infradead.org, agruen@suse.de, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, matthltc@us.ibm.com, Sukadev Bhattiprolu , Oleg Nesterov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Eric Paris wrote: > From: Andreas Gruenbacher > > Pass the process identifiers of the triggering processes to fanotify > listeners: this information is useful for event filtering and logging. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher > Signed-off-by: Eric Paris > --- > > ?fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c ? ? ?| ? ?5 +++-- > ?fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | ? ?1 + > ?fs/notify/notification.c ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?3 +++ > ?include/linux/fanotify.h ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?1 + > ?include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h ? | ? ?1 + > ?5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c > index 5b0b6b4..881067d 100644 > --- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c > +++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c > @@ -10,8 +10,9 @@ static bool should_merge(struct fsnotify_event *old, struct fsnotify_event *new) > ?{ > ? ? ? ?pr_debug("%s: old=%p new=%p\n", __func__, old, new); > > - ? ? ? if ((old->to_tell == new->to_tell) && > - ? ? ? ? ? (old->data_type == new->data_type)) { > + ? ? ? if (old->to_tell == new->to_tell && > + ? ? ? ? ? old->data_type == new->data_type && > + ? ? ? ? ? old->tgid == new->tgid) { > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?switch (old->data_type) { > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?case (FSNOTIFY_EVENT_PATH): > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if ((old->path.mnt == new->path.mnt) && > diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c > index 7646111..7cfb2f6 100644 > --- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c > +++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c > @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ static ssize_t fill_event_metadata(struct fsnotify_group *group, > ? ? ? ?metadata->event_len = FAN_EVENT_METADATA_LEN; > ? ? ? ?metadata->vers = FANOTIFY_METADATA_VERSION; > ? ? ? ?metadata->mask = fanotify_outgoing_mask(event->mask); > + ? ? ? metadata->pid = pid_vnr(event->tgid); Eric, you never replied to my point about pid namespaces (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/1/2). I'm still concerned that it's a problem for this patch. I've cc'd some pid namespace folks, listed the problems, and some alternative solutions (where I could think of any) below: 1. Since fanotify doesn't hold a reference to the struct pid then the pid can become stale before the event is acted upon. solution a: Just ignoring this problem, like other interfaces often do, is probably ok. ... ? solution z: Seems to require taking a reference to the pid and giving userspace a way to drop the reference after it's done using this value to refer to the process (yuck). 2. If the event recipient does a clone and enters a new pidns the pid number will be incorrect without any indication. solution a: The events could be flushed during clone(CLONE_NEWPID) but then userspace would miss them. solution b: Translating the pids wouldn't work because the tasks generaly won't exist in the new namespace. So perhaps just write negative values in the pid fields during clone(CLONE_NEWPID). 3. If the listening process is not in the same or an ancestor pid namespace of the triggering process then there is no correct pid corresponding to the event. (Note: Always using the initial pid namespace isn't a good [interim] solution -- then programs relying on fanotify couldn't run in other pid namespaces). solution a: Again, perhaps they should be set to negative values. ... ? solution z: Disable fanotify in non-initial pid namespaces (yuck). Cheers, -Matt Helsley -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/