Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 17:06:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 17:06:47 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:20499 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 17:06:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 23:06:45 +0200 From: Dave Jones To: James Bottomley Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 arch subdivision into machine types for 2.5.8 Message-ID: <20020416230645.D32185@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , James Bottomley , "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200204162051.g3GKpDb05800@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 03:51:12PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > I agree with both of these. The main problem with the memory setup calls is > that most of them are static. I could export them and do overrides, like I do > for everything else, but as someone who also debugs the kernel, I like static > functions because they tell me the use is tightly isolated. I could easily do > two files, it was just looking more messy. > > I'll see if I can export some of the setup.c internals and re-arrange this in > a more orderly way. I think this is where Patrick Mochel's recent work in that area is going to come in handy. setup.c has been nicely abstracted out into seperate parts, that should make things a little easier. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/